Grand Reopening

ZieherSmith is pleased to announce our Grand Reopening in a 3500 square foot, storefront gallery at 516 West 20th Street. Designed by Dufner Heighes Architects and constructed by BILT/DFI, the new space more than doubles the size of our previous location, expanding the ability to provide a visible and welcoming forum for contemporary art.

Grand Reopening features a selection of ZieherSmith’s represented artists including new, large-scale work by Wes Lang and Eddie Martinez, a kinetic installation and collage-work by Javier Piñón, paintings by Liz Markus and Chuck Webster, and sculpture by Rachel Owens and Mike Womack. Adorning the new façade is a Tucker Nichols’ banner, featured on the postcard, and inspired by an existing drawing by the artist and the following clause in the gallery’s new lease: Tenant shall not… install any banner, flag or the like on the exterior of the Building without the specific prior approval of Landlord other than any banner with the words “Grand Opening” or words of similar import, which banner shall be permitted during the first ninety (90) days of the Term only.

The gallery’s forthcoming schedule will include exhibitions by renowned French artist Stéphane Calais; the New York debut of British artist Matt Stokes’s these are the days, a video installation co-produced by ZieherSmith and Arthouse, Austin; and book launches for the Stokes catalogue as well as Wes Lang’s The Paradise Club and Scott Zieher’s Band of Bikers.

www.ziehersmith.com braskart10

Dan Attoe


EVERYTHING STARTS AS SOMETHING YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND

All my paintings and neon come from a process of creating a new image every day. For seven years I did a painting every weekday, now I do daily drawings. This is partially out of respect for all of the people I know who work regular jobs, because I don’t consider myself different from them. It’s also partially out of an enjoyment of the freedom I have in my practice and a desire to push myself and see what I can come up with next. Finally, it’s because I have an interest in maintaining a record of my intellectual development, for myself, and for anthropological purposes.

As part of my commitment to all of these things, it’s my opinion that honesty plays an important role in choosing the images I make. What I take to be “honest” is a matter of paying attention to things that I’m genuinely interested in. To me this means listening to my biological and intellectual needs without worrying about looking socially unacceptable, smart, out of touch or pandering to my conscience. From any given series of ideas to draw or paint, I’ll choose those that have a certain “electricity” to them, that hold my attention and get me excited or engaged.

In order to maintain vitality my process has to remain flexible. I can’t hold myself to any one line of thought, a style, or subject matter. At the same time, I’m a slow learner, and there are certain things that seem to be limitless in their value to me, such as: wilderness landscapes, sex and violence. These particular subjects are due to things I imprinted on in my rural childhood, things I have attraction to as a male human and things related to social and cultural anxieties.

At this point in the evolution of this daily process (I’m about at the twelve year mark) most of the images that hold my attention come from a place that is best described as “peripheral”. These are things that my deliberate mind is a little too dumb to run into on its linear path, but it can sometimes help out. Often, it’s hard to recreate these images because it’s like they’re in the corner of my eye, and if I look directly at them, they change shape. Sometimes, I watch them roll through my head right before I go to sleep.

Almost all of my images are entirely invented. I only use photographs or other source materials as reference (in most cases), the way a writer would use a dictionary. It’s my belief that invented images contain more nuanced information related to development. In addition, there’s a pure rush of excitement that comes from making an image that didn’t exist in the world before.

Over time, these peripheral images have gotten more complicated. Things like atmosphere, depth, dimension and details in character of people and places have gotten more specific and increased in their range of complexity (some of them are still pretty simple). The result is that I’ve broadened the spectrum of art that I look at to inform my painting. My painting process owes much to early American artists like Thomas Moran, Frederic Edwin Church and Albert Bierstadt, as well as other “traditional” painters like Frederic Remington, Caspar David Friedrich, Edward Hopper and Andrew Wyeth. I feel a huge respect for their facility with paint, and I respond to their ability to create an environment and convey character.

Of course, the meat of my work is actually very little about standing on these men’s shoulders, or even about relating to the art world at all. Far more important to maintaining vitality and “usefulness” to myself, and anyone else who may be interested in the development of someone from this time and place is the part of my process that I call “Field Research”. By this I mean just going out and participating in the world the way a guy my age, of my upbringing, who lives where I do, would. This part of my job is pretty hard to do wrong. I just get to do the things that I want to do: hiking, surfing, taking road trips, spending time with friends, etc. The things that set my work apart from someone such as Thomas Moran, other than my interests (some might say quality), are in many cases simply products of my time: I can travel places in shorter time than he could, I have access to technology that allows me to see the world in different ways, maintain dialogs with many people easily and offer insights into things that might never have occurred to me otherwise, I also have an awareness of the changing of the world socially and environmentally ˆ all of this contributes to the sensibility of my work. I understand that the information in my work will be received in varying degrees by different viewers, but I hope that some usefulness can be obtained by anyone.

Peres Projects

MICHAELA EICHWALD:


MICHAELA EICHWALD: The Classical
6 SEPTEMBER – 4 OCTOBER 2009
OPENING SATURDAY 5 SEPTEMBER, 6:30 – 8:30 PM

Michaela Eichwald is a German artist based in Berlin. For her first solo exhibition at Vilma Gold, Eichwald will present a series of new paintings and sculptures.

“Although Michaela Eichwald has been an artist, writer and protagonist of the Cologne art scene since the 1990s, it is only relatively recently that she has begun to venture regularly into gallery spaces with her multi-disciplinary work. Her neo-bohemian bricolaged sculptures and small, cultivatedly naive ‘bad’ paintings suggest life beyond their simple means. The artist’s New York début show, ‘Ergriffenes Dasein: Artist Writer Mentalist’, included such reconfigured found objects as metal Tchotchkes rescued from an incinerator. Sculptures such as Neues aus dem Ahrtal (News from the Ahrtal, 2008) – made from resin poured into a bag filled with found objects such as a watch with no face, a bunch of mussels, pills and coins – suggest that her wit-filled works are part quirky time capsules and part subjective anti-monuments.”
Dominic Eichler, Frieze Art Fair Yearbook 2008-9

Eichwald’s recent solo exhibitions include Total Awareness Of All Dimensions (Dimensions Variable) at the Aachener Kunstverein (2009), Reena Spaulings, New York (2008) and Europian Kunsthalle c/o Ebertplatz, Cologne (2008). She has exhibited widely in museum group shows including Kunsthalle Exnergasse Vienna (2008), ZKM, Karlsruhe (2008), White Colums, New York (2008), Museum of Contemporary Art, Miami and Henry Art Gallery, Seattle (2007), ICA Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania and The Power Plant, Toronto (2006) and Künstlerhaus Stuttgart, Stuttgart (2006).

Vilmagold